CAA Operational Authorisation · £10m public liability · ICO registered · VAT no. GB 519 2696 62
Critical AssetDrone Inspections
Flagship service

The Site Security
Vulnerability Assessment.

One engagement. Two disciplines. Broker-ready evidence of what a hostile actor could find about your site — and what a broker or underwriter can review before renewal.

Not sure if this is the right fit? Start with a free 30-minute Discovery Call — honest advice, no obligation. Book a Discovery Call
New briefing paper · April 2026

Cable Theft at Unmanned UK Renewables Sites.

Patterns, Losses and Prevention.

A broker- and underwriter-facing analysis drawn from UK public data, trade reporting, vendor and field intelligence, and peer-reviewed crime-science literature. 25 pages · 35 sources · 80 KB PDF.

Why this exists

Aerial capture and threat intelligence — in one engagement.

Most drone operators don’t carry out intelligence work. Most security consultancies don’t fly. We do both, for one fixed price, in one site visit.

A fixed-scope, productised engagement built around a single day on site: a pre-visit OSINT (open-source intelligence — structured review of public sources: forums, marketplaces, leaked breach data, dark-web sites, Telegram channels and social media) and credential-exposure sweep, on-site aerial capture with 3D digital twin, structured physical walkdown, and a broker-ready briefing pack your broker can hand to the underwriter.

What we don’t do Credential testing Penetration testing Live OT systems Full scope boundary ↓
Engagement timeline

From brief to briefing pack.

PHASE 01
Scope

Free scoping call. Asset, insurer concerns, site constraints. Fixed-price quote within 2 working days.

PHASE 02
Intelligence sweep

Pre-visit OSINT: public attack surface, breach-data credential checks, dark-web and Telegram-channel monitoring for solar-sector targeting chatter, geolocation and social signals.

PHASE 03
Site day

One visit. Aerial capture, 3D digital twin, structured walkdown — fences, gates, lighting, sightlines, access control.

PHASE 04
Briefing pack

Dual-graded findings register, operator-owned control-review pathway across three horizons, and a one-page broker summary for underwriter handover.

What you get back

Eight deliverables. One assessment.

01
3D digital twin
Photogrammetric reconstruction of the whole site.
02
Annotated 2D findings pack
Marked-up imagery showing exactly where the problems are.
03
OSINT / CTI threat report
Dark-web and Telegram-channel monitoring for sector-targeting chatter — graded by confidence, sourced and defensible.
04
Dual-graded findings register
Every observation banded for risk priority and evidence confidence — bands, not numerical scores.
05
Operator-owned control-review pathway
Control areas surfaced for client review — not specifications, designs, quotations, costings or fix-by-date commitments.
06
Broker-ready one-pager
Hand it straight to your broker.
07
Credential exposure check
Staff, executive and shared service accounts cross-referenced against breach datasets.
08
90-day aftercare
Three months of OSINT watch-listing and a progress check-in call.
How we grade findings

Two grades on every finding.

Intelligence discipline requires two scores on every finding, not one. What’s the priority, and how firm is the evidence? We run both systems on every item in the report, and we keep them separate.

RISK PRIORITY
Severity × likelihood — banded
A banded judgement (Critical / High / Medium / Low / Informational) of how serious an exposure is and how likely it is to be exploited. Findings are sorted by priority band into short, medium and long-term horizons — an indicator for sequencing, not a fix-by-date deadline. Decisions on control choices, timing and method remain with the client and its qualified advisers.
Example: “40-metre CCTV dead zone covering the main approach” — banded High priority, short-term horizon.
EVIDENCE CONFIDENCE
Admiralty grading (A1–F6)
Source reliability (A–F) × information credibility (1–6). The NATO-origin framework used in formal cyber threat intelligence. Tells you whether to trust the finding — a 2019 leaked password is not graded the same as a mailbox observed in active operational use during a site engagement.
Example: an on-site walkdown observation is A1. A dark-web mention from a 2021 dump is C3.

Keeping the two systems separate is why the findings stand up under broker and underwriter review — and why evidence-weak items are never weighted the same as evidence-strong ones. Source-reliability grading is applied under the methodology recognised in formal cyber threat intelligence (SANS GIAC GCTI · Treadstone 71 CTIA · UK PHIA framework).

Anatomy of a finding

What an entry in the register looks like.

Two specimen findings in the register format — one physical, one OSINT. Dual grading, source trail and control-review horizon on every entry. The examples below are illustrative; site names, identifiers and dates are fictional.

Specimen · illustrative only
SPECIMEN
F-014 Physical
CCTV dead zone at north-east access-track terminus.
RISK PRIORITY
High
Severity × likelihood (banded)
EVIDENCE
Admiralty A1
Reliable × Confirmed
OBSERVATION

40-metre gap between camera NE-1 and NE-2 coverage cones. Access-track terminus is unmonitored. Perimeter visibility interrupted by poplar line; night-time PIR lighting does not extend across gap.

SOURCE

On-site walkdown · aerial capture ref. DT-2140 · daylight and after-dark lighting walk.

REVIEW REFERRAL

The operator may refer this finding to a qualified CCTV/security and electrical contractor to verify camera coverage, lighting coverage and operational requirements. Critical Asset does not specify the design response or assess control adequacy.

PRIORITY HORIZONShort term · indicative
SPECIMEN
F-003 OSINT
Shared service account exposed on a 2024 credential dump.
RISK PRIORITY
HIGH*
Potentially Critical pending operator confirmation; credential validity untested.
EVIDENCE
Admiralty B2
Usually reliable × Probably true
OBSERVATION

Shared service address facilities@[client-domain] appears on a 2024 credential dump with plaintext password. Cross-checked against 2025 dark-web references — the mailbox address continues to appear in relevant exposure sources. Credential validity is untested. Potential re-use across site authentication and supplier portals.

SOURCE

Breach dataset ref. DWD-2024-Q2 · corroborating dark-web ref. DW-2025-09-14.

REVIEW REFERRAL

The operator may refer this finding to its IT/security function or a qualified cyber provider to confirm credential status and determine any appropriate account, MFA, supplier-portal or incident-response steps. Critical Asset does not test credential validity and does not certify the status of any account.

Scope note: exposure identified from public sources. Credentials are not tested; attempting authentication would be outside scope and may engage the Computer Misuse Act 1990.
PRIORITY HORIZONShort term · indicative
SPECIMEN
Broker one-pager
What your broker takes to the underwriter.

A standalone single-page extract: top findings, dual-graded, aggregate risk rating, operator-owned control-review pathway and insurer-relevant callouts. Built for renewal handover — so the broker or underwriter can understand the headline position before reviewing the full pack if required.

SITE: Specimen Solar Farm (fictional)
ASSESSMENT: SSV-2026-SPECIMEN
DATE: Illustrative only
FINDINGS
Example only
Prioritised by risk band and source confidence
AGGREGATE RISK
Elevated
Banded judgement · not a numerical score

Specimen content throughout. Both downloadable specimens are linked further down this page.

What the register is
  • · A structured set of observations, banded for risk priority and source-graded for evidence confidence.
  • · Control-review areas against each finding — for client and adviser consideration, not specifications or fix-by-date commitments.
  • · A snapshot in time, valid until material site, threat-actor or breach-data conditions change.
What it is not
  • · Not a chartered security-engineering specification or a CSyP/SyI consultant’s opinion.
  • · Not a guarantee against incident, and not a numerical risk score — priorities are banded judgements.
  • · Not a fix-by-date deadline. Horizons are indicative sequencing; control choices, design and timing remain with the client and its qualified advisers.
See what the deliverable looks like

Two specimen PDFs you can download.

Most prospective broker, underwriter and asset-owner readers have never seen this category of deliverable before. Rather than describe it, here it is. Both PDFs are watermarked SPECIMEN on every page and use fictional site, operator and source detail — the structure, grading, scope boundary, broker one-pager and chain-of-custody anatomy match what a real engagement produces.

REPORT FORMAT

Specimen SSVA — report format

A specimen example of the SSVA report anatomy — cover, executive summary, dual-graded findings register, two deep-dives, annotated site schematic, OSINT summary, operator-owned control-review pathway, standalone broker one-pager, chain-of-custody and source-list appendices. This is a format sample only.

Download PDF 14 pages · ~40 KB
Worked example
DAY-OF-VISIT ENGAGEMENT

Specimen SSVA — engagement report

A fuller fictional worked example showing how a single site visit flows into the final deliverable — on-day weather, the tractor-on-the-access-track delay logged in chain-of-custody, the full five-question operator interview, four graded findings and broker handover material.

Download PDF 19 pages · ~70 KB

Both PDFs are illustrative only and are not engagement evidence. Asset, operator, kit serials, interview content and findings are fictional — modelled on the structure of a Critical Asset SSVA and on publicly reported UK renewables risk patterns. For an actual engagement quote or to discuss the deliverable for a specific asset, contact info@criticalasset.co.uk.

Why it stacks up

Illustrative economics.

LOSS-TO-COST RANGE
13–130×
Reported loss ranges against our Complex-tier fee.
COMPLEX-TIER FEE
£3,950+ VAT
Fixed
Fixed price. Broadly comparable to a day's revenue at a mid-scale solar site.
LOSS-EVENT RANGE
£50k–£500k+
Reported range for cable theft, copper theft and arson at unmanned renewables sites.
By site size · what's at stake

A day’s revenue, in context.

Three indicative UK solar profiles at recent wholesale and PPA pricing — ~£75/MWh blended, ~11% capacity factor, ~£10k/MW/year OPEX. Day-rate figures are revenue, not net profit (debt structure varies widely). The point is the order of magnitude an underwriter or asset owner is reading off.

SMALL · 5 MW
~£1,000
Day-rate revenue
Annual revenue: ~£375k
Standard fee £2,950: ~3 days’ revenue
£50k loss event: ~7 weeks of generation
Sweet spot
MEDIUM · 20 MW
~£4,100
Day-rate revenue
Annual revenue: ~£1.5m
Complex fee £3,950: ~1 day’s revenue
2-week outage: ~£29k + repair costs
LARGE · 50 MW
~£10,300
Day-rate revenue
Annual revenue: ~£3.75m
Large fee £5,450: ~½ a day’s revenue
Extended outage: ~£72k+ revenue + repair

Illustrative loss range, drawn from reported UK insurance, police and industry examples for cable theft, copper theft and arson at unmanned renewables sites. The ratio divides the lower and upper bounds of that range by our £3,950 Complex-tier fee. Not a guarantee. Actual loss exposure depends on site capacity, downtime, repair cost, location, incident history and insurer requirements. We quote against your scope, not a model.

Clean scope boundary
What we explicitly don't do
  • ✗ Credential testing or password validation
  • ✗ Penetration testing of OT/SCADA systems
  • ✗ Hardware vulnerability assessment
  • ✗ Panel performance or thermal efficiency work
  • ✗ Anything touching live operational technology
  • ✗ Infiltration of closed dark-web forums or Telegram groups — monitoring is restricted to publicly accessible sources

We identify credential and infrastructure exposure — we do not test, validate or authenticate with it. If intrusive cyber testing is needed, we recommend that the client instruct an appropriately accredited cyber provider, such as a CREST-accredited firm. Scope remains limited to evidence capture, intelligence-led assessment and operator-review reporting.

Credential & data handling
How exposure findings are reported.

Credential exposure checks use lawful, publicly available intelligence sources and licensed breach datasets. We do not test, validate or attempt to authenticate with any credential we identify. Plaintext passwords are never reproduced in client reports.

Where a credential is found exposed, the report contains only risk-relevant indicators — account type, exposure context, source confidence (Admiralty grade), likely business impact and operator-review considerations. Personal data is processed under UK GDPR; see the privacy notice for the lawful basis and retention.

CREDENTIAL: OSINT and threat-intelligence work is performed under SANS Institute methodology (GIAC GCTI + GOSI certified) and Treadstone 71 Certified Threat Intelligence Analyst tradecraft — aligned with the UK Professional Head of Intelligence Analysis (PHIA) framework used across UK government intelligence functions.

Fixed-price tiers

Transparent pricing, every engagement.

STANDARD
£2,950+ VAT
Fixed
Single site, 10–30 MW solar equivalent.
COMPLEX
£3,950+ VAT
Fixed
Higher complexity or mixed-asset sites.
LARGE
£5,450+ VAT
Fixed
Multi-perimeter / extended footprint.
PORTFOLIO
£7,500+ VAT
Fixed
Multiple sites under one engagement.
Common questions

Before you enquire.

The questions buyers ask most often before signing — answered honestly.

How long is the Assessment valid for?
Findings have different shelf-lives. Physical findings — CCTV gaps, fence condition, lighting, sightlines — are valid until something on site materially changes. OSINT and credential-exposure findings have a shorter window, typically 6–12 months before fresh breaches, leaks and threat-actor patterns shift the picture. Most clients re-run a focused refresh annually and a full re-engagement every 2–3 years, or sooner after a material site change.
How is this different from a standard drone inspection?
A standard drone inspection captures imagery for a defined deliverable — roof condition, crop NDVI, photogrammetry, progress capture. A Site Security Vulnerability Assessment uses drone capture as one input alongside open-source intelligence and structured threat analysis to answer a different question: where you’re exposed, which threat types may have the capability or incentive to target you, and how an underwriter would read the evidence. It’s a methodology, not a different photo product.
Will my insurer recognise the Admiralty grading?
Admiralty source grading (A1–F6) is the framework used in intelligence-led reporting and helps brokers and underwriters understand source confidence at a glance. The pack also includes a plain-English broker summary built for renewal handover — so the findings stand on their own without the reader needing prior familiarity with the framework.
What’s not covered?
The Assessment is intelligence-graded reporting on physical-site and open-source exposures. It is not a chartered building or RICS property inspection, not a structural opinion, not a live IT penetration test, and not legal advice. We don’t attempt to authenticate with any credential we identify, and we don’t validate breach data by trying to log in. If your need is structural, legal or live red-team testing, the right route is a chartered specialist — and we’ll say so on the call.
How fast can you deliver?
From signed engagement to delivered report is typically 10–14 working days for a single site, longer for portfolio engagements. The capture day itself is one day on site; OSINT collection, analytic work and dual-grading take the bulk of the timeline. If insurer renewal is the deadline we’ll commit to a delivery date in the engagement letter — and where renewal is days away rather than weeks, an Incident Response engagement is sometimes the better entry point.
Already been hit?

If your site has already been hit, the Assessment isn’t the right starting point.

Cable theft, arson or vandalism in the last few days needs Incident Response: rapid aerial documentation, an OSINT indicator review for targeting, opportunistic or cluster-linked indicators, and a broker- and insurer-facing evidence pack. The Assessment is what comes next — preventing the second hit, with a discount applied if signed within 30 days of an incident engagement.